SciData

Status: Active
Effective From
Scientific Data to be Provided to the Commission (revised at WCPFC4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 19 and 20)

Related Obligations

Obligation Description Effective Category Audit Point Adopted Audit Point Definition ARPt2 Inclusion CMR Inclusion Average Score (%) When Evaluated
SciData 01
Estimates of Annual Catches
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL No No No
98
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 01
Estimates of Annual Catches
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP Yes Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. No No
97
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 01-05, 07
Scientific Data to be Provided Decision
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current No No No
SciData 02
Number of vessels active
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL No No No
97
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 02
Number of vessels active
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP Yes Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. No No
98
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 03
Operational Level Catch and Effort Data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL No No No
98
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 03
Operational Level Catch and Effort Data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP Yes Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. No No
99
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 04
Catch and effort data aggregated by time period and geographic area
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL N/A No No
95
2014
2013
SciData 04
Catch and effort data aggregated by time period and geographic area
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP N/A No No
84
2014
2013
SciData 05
Size composition data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL No No No
91
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 05
Size composition data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP Yes Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. No No
94
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
SciData 07
Time periods covered and schedule for the provision of data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current DL N/A No No
100
2014
SciData 07
Time periods covered and schedule for the provision of data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
06 Feb 2013 - Current RP N/A No No
100
2014